beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2012.10.31 2012고정922

폭행등

Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Of the facts charged of this case, the prosecution against assault is dismissed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 18, 2011, at around 02:45, Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, 911, which was accompanied by Defendant C as a criminal charge and an office of the Suwon Police Station and the office.

At around 02:50, the Defendant, at the same time in the criminal and office, stored a voluntary dynamic procedure and disclosed at any time to leave the office, publicly insultd the victim D (30 years of age, south) with the Defendant C and three police officers of the same franc as Defendant C’s and the Dong police officers, on the ground that the Defendant’s francing of this francch flab, and the Defendant’s francing of the flab would have the flab, and the flab

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness C and D;

1. Statement of each police statement of D and E;

1. Application of D’s Acts and subordinate statutes on the complaint;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 311 of the Selection of Punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act (in cases of the inducement in a workhouse, 50,000 won a day);

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (the suspended sentence: fine of 700,00 won) of the suspended sentence (the defendant seems to have lived in good faith until now, and the defendant was subject to sexual indecent act from C and reported to 112. Rather, there are circumstances for the defendant to take into account as a punishment for the perpetrator of the assault. Even according to the evidence of the judgment below, the defendant is not deemed to have expressed his complaint to the unspecified majority of police officers working at the police station at the time, not to have expressed his desire for the victim's personal, but rather to have expressed his complaint to the unspecified majority of police officers working at the police station at the time. It appears that D will act as the victim in the course of the treatment of the case and rather dealt with the case by preparing a written complaint, etc.) among the facts charged of the prosecution of this case, the summary of assault and assault of the defendant at issue [the defendant] is an indecent act in front of 10:30 on Nov. 18, 2011 on the right side of the victim.