건물명도(인도)
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On January 24, 2015, the Plaintiff agreed with the Defendant that the Plaintiff entered into a lease contract with the Defendant for lease of KRW 100,000,000 of the deposit for lease on a deposit basis (hereinafter “the instant lease contract”) and for the term from February 25, 2015 to February 25, 2017 (hereinafter “the lease contract”), and that “the lessee shall cooperate with the lessee to obtain the loan for lease on a deposit basis, and the lessor shall deposit the lease on a deposit basis only with the relevant bank at the time of eviction.”
B. On February 25, 2015, the Defendant paid the remainder of the deposit to the Plaintiff, and around that time, occupied and resided in the instant house.
C. On October 19, 2016, the Plaintiff revealed that the Plaintiff was scheduled to sell the instant house to the Defendant, and that there was no intent to renew the instant lease contract. On January 9, 2017, the instant lease contract again ends on February 25, 2017, and thereafter, the Plaintiff sent the same notice to the Defendant by means of content certification, which would restore the instant house to its original state and request delivery by February 26, 2017, and then deliver the said notice to the Defendant around that time.
On January 10, 2017, the Plaintiff entered into a sales contract with C to sell the instant housing as the purchase price of KRW 200,000,000, the remainder payment, and the date of delivery of real estate on February 27, 2017, and received the down payment of KRW 20,000 from C. Around that time, the Plaintiff paid KRW 80,000,000 to a licensed real estate agent D who arranged the said sales contract.
E. On February 22, 2017, the Plaintiff and the Defendant set the time and place for the delivery of the instant house and the return of the deposit for lease. At this time, the Plaintiff requested the Defendant to inform the Defendant of the name and account number of the bank that provided the loan, and the Defendant paid the deposit for lease with a credit loan, not with a deposit for lease.