However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 20:50 on August 21, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 20:50, the Defendant: (b) 101 of the Cheongju-si Civil Building C Building C, and (c) on the grounds that the victim, despite the fact that the victim did not have a snicker, had the Defendant snicker and had the other snicker as above, the victim followed the above facts; (d) the victim was asked about the snicker’s disease on the floor; (e) the victim was flicker in the toilet door; (e) the head of the slicker’s disease, which is a dangerous object, was flicked at one time; and (e) the victim suffered bodily injury, such as the second snicker in the number of treatment days

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant or D with the police officer;

1. A criminal investigation report (Attachment of a medical record), application of Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The punishment shall be determined as above in light of the following: (a) the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Probation Criminal Act is against the defendant seriously; (b) the defendant has no record of criminal punishment other than the punishment imposed once by a fine; (c) the victim does not want the punishment by agreement with the defendant; and (d) the circumstances of the crime may be considered.