2. The judgment that the defendant led to the confession and reflect of all of his own crimes, and that there is a family member to support the crime of this case is favorable to the defendant. However, since the crime of this case not only damages the trust in electronic commerce, but also damages the majority and the amount of defraudation, the crime of this case is not less than 16 million won in total, and since the crime of this case is not less than 16 million won in total, the crime of this case has been committed several times including imprisonment four times for the same Internet fraud crimes, the victims' losses have not been completely recovered up to the trial, and in addition, considering the defendant's age, character and behavior, family environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, the means and consequence of the crime, and the result of the application of sentencing guidelines of the Sentencing Committee by the Sentencing Committee, it is not recognized that the punishment of the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(However, by adding "each police protocol of statement to D and B" to the summary column of the evidence in the judgment below, it is corrected ex officio in accordance with Article 25 (1) of the Regulations on Criminal Procedure).