구상금
1. The Defendants: (a) within the scope of property inherited from each network G to the Plaintiff, each of the KRW 15,901,047 and the Defendants’ amounted to December 12.
1. Basic facts
A. On September 21, 2006, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the deceased G with the Daejeon District Court Branch of 2006Kadan25581, and on September 21, 2006, the said court rendered a judgment that “G shall pay to the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 31,802,094 and KRW 25,941,837 with the interest of KRW 15% per annum from April 11, 2006.” The said judgment became final and conclusive on October 11, 2006.
B. The deceased G died on March 27, 2013, and the Defendants are the inheritors of the deceased.
C. On August 22, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an application for a payment order against the net G on August 22, 2016 for the extension of the statute of limitations for the claim ordered in the said judgment of indemnity amount, but corrected the indication of the party to
【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap’s 1 through 17, 66, and 67, the purport of the whole pleadings and arguments
2. Comprehensively taking account of the purport of the entire pleadings in the statement No. 4, the Defendants filed a petition for a trial on limited recognition of inheritance with the Daejeon Family Court Branch of Daejeon District Court Decision 2016Radan5154, and received the adjudication that accepted the qualified acceptance on February 3, 2017.
According to the above facts and the above facts, the lawsuit of this case, which was instituted for the extension of the prescription period of the claim ordered by the judgment in the previous suit, is exceptionally in interest in the lawsuit. Thus, the defendants are obligated to pay to the plaintiff the amount equivalent to 15,901,047 won, each equivalent to 1/2 of the inherited property inherited from each net G, within the scope of inherited property, and 12,970,918 won, each of which constitutes 12,970,918 won, from April 11, 2006 to the day of repayment.
3. If so, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is justified within the above scope of recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed as they are without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.