However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 13, 2017, at around B 06:03, the Defendant driven a cargo truck with B 25 tons, and used three lanes in front of the Yongsan-gu Party located in Busan Southern-gu, by using two lanes in the direction of a light-burging direction in the direction of a light-burging at the port of the entrance. Since the company's duties are bad, the Defendant saw, against an unspecified bus, who is going to run by the Defendant, with the vehicle of which another bus is running by the Defendant, with a bad share of the vehicle, brought about a heavy interval, such as interfering with its course by using the said cargo vehicle operated by the Defendant.

1. Around 06:03 on April 13, 2017, the Defendant used three-lanes in front of the Yongsan District Party located in the Southern-gu Busan metropolitan area in the direction of a luminous omb from the room of the use of the two-lanes in the direction of a luminous omb. For the foregoing reason, the Defendant carried the said cargo in front of the city bus No. 138 driven by the victim C (41) (S) who continued the said cargo and left three-lanes from the Defendant’s right side and driven by the victim C (S 41) who continued the said cargo on the ground of the foregoing reason, carried the vehicle in front of the city bus No. 138, which was driven by the Defendant, and obstructed the course of leaving the bus No. 138 above to the right side, thereby obstructing the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victim by using a dangerous vehicle.

2. Around 06:04 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) proceeded three-lanes with the city bus No. 155, which was driven by the Defendant, in front of the cargo vehicle driven by the Defendant; (b) discovered the bus No. 155 in front of the cargo vehicle driven by the Defendant; (c) changed the course to a two-lane; and (d) changed the course to a three-lane; and (e) changed to a three-lane, the Defendant 155 in front of the vehicle driven by the Defendant, thereby interfering with the course by rapidly cutting in the future of the city bus No. 155.

Then, the defendant was stopped in front of the lane such as urban bus No. 155 at the intersection.

The defendant did not start even if the green light was turned on at the above intersection, and the damaged person's course is to damage the cargo vehicle that the defendant has driven.