If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The defendant is a taxi engineer, and the victim B (the age of 62) has liveded for 17 years.

At around 14:55 on March 6, 2013, the Defendant: (a) reported that the Defendant was a fluoral fluort for cleaning aluminium in the ward on the ground that the Defendant was a fluoral fluoral fluor C, which caused the Defendant to die with a high wave; (b) caused the victim’s head, etc. to be tightly fluord in several times; and (c) caused the victim’s head, etc. to be fluord by drinking.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol protocol law to B

1. Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 257(1) of the choice of punishment, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of a fine (where the victim expressed his/her intention to use the defendant at once, considering not only the victim, who had liveded for 17 years, but also did not cause a breath without breathing or going through breathing, but also the victim, who had been living together for 17 years, was a victim of a breathic disease, but also did not commit violence and bodily injury like the crime

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;