beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 2016.09.01 2016노1297

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)

Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant's vehicle was in contact with pedestrians while the vehicle was operated by the defendant, and the defendant voluntarily stopped and stopped the vehicle and started the vehicle again with him, knowing the fact that the movement of the movement of the movement of the movement of the movement of the movement of the movement of the movement of the movement of the movement of the movement of the movement of the movement of the movement of the movement of the movement of the movement of the movement of the movement of the movement of the movement of the movement of the movement of the movement of the movement of the movement of the movement of the movement of the movement of the movement of the movement of the movement of the movement of the movement of the movement

Nevertheless, the lower court acquitted the Defendant of the facts charged, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Examining the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below in light of the records, since the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone cannot be deemed to have been proven beyond a reasonable doubt, the court below acquitted the public prosecutor of the facts charged as to the same purport, and there is no error of law by mistake of facts as alleged by the public prosecutor.

(3) If the prosecutor's appeal is without merit, it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition, as long as it is difficult to conclude that the injured party's injury solely due to the traffic accident of this case as stated in detail in the decision of the court below.

(However) However, it is obvious that “the part of the vehicle driver’s seat” in Section 12 of the judgment of the court below is a clerical error in the letter of “the part of the vehicle wheeler’s seat”, and thus, it shall be corrected in accordance with Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure.