도로법위반
The defendant shall be innocent.
On October 18, 1993, at around 19:55, the Defendant, his employee, loaded and operated the freight exceeding 1.1 ton of the 2-scale weight of B freight vehicles owned by the Defendant on the road in front of the central inspection station located in the efficiebbbbbbb in the efficibibbbbbbbbb, etc., thereby violating the restrictions on the operation of vehicles by the road management agency.
2. Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545, Mar. 10, 1993; Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995; Act No. 4920, Mar. 10, 1995; Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995; Act No. 8446, Nov. 28, 2013; Act No. 13555, Feb. 28, 2013; Act No. 14955, Feb. 28, 2015; Act No. 1486, Feb. 2
“As it is based on the part above, its effect was retroactively lost by the above decision.”
Thus, the facts charged of this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.