권리범위확인(실)
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Basic facts
(a) The name of the Plaintiff’s registered device of this case (Evidence A 2: C/ E/ / F claims 1 / d d d h d d h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h
An accusation subject to confirmation (attached Form 3) (attached Form 2) is related to a specific “G” by the defendant, and the explanation and drawings are as shown in [attached Form].
C. On July 17, 2015, the Defendant filed a claim against the Plaintiff seeking confirmation of the scope of rights of the instant devices under the Patent Tribunal No. 2015Da3971, and the petition for confirmation was not within the scope of rights of the instant devices.
The Intellectual Property Trial and Appeal Board shall be bound by a petition to be confirmed on March 29, 2016.