Of the facts charged in this case, the prosecution against assault and intimidation is dismissed.

From April 6, 2018, the Defendant was living together with the victim C (V, 57 years old) and from April 6, 2018, and was notified of the objection from the victim due to the depression.

On June 29, 2018, the Defendant entered the victim's house located in North-gu D Apartment 2, 308 Dong-gu, North-gu, North-dong 2, North-dong 2, 2018, and expressed the victim's desire to "Isk, h., to occur, h., h., h., h.," and told the victim that "Is the victim's body h., h., h., h., h., h., h., h., h., h., h., h., h., h., h. h.

B. We also examine the bones of conflict.

It should be more appropriate.

(d) Death.

The term "man, dead, and killed........" refers to the case where the victim's body was satisfy and the case where the victim's body was satisfy.

After cutting the cell phone of the victim who intends to continue to report to the police, the Defendant collected the cell phone of the victim, and then, she inflicted injury, such as dump, including a dump, which requires approximately four weeks of medical treatment, on the ground that golf loans, which are dangerous objects in living rooms, were collected, to display the victim's head toward the head of the victim, cut the victim's head, cut the victim's golf loans after the victim was familiar with the head of the victim, and was collected with golf loans, which are dangerous objects on the floor of the living room, and suffered injury to the victim, such as a dump, which includes two dump that require approximately four weeks of medical treatment.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and inflicted an injury on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol against C and E;

1. Application of the medical certificate, each photographic statute;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Serious injury, such as cutting off two cages by using forceless violence on the ground that the defendant and the victim who had returned to the defendant demand separate charges, is disadvantageous to the grounds for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act (hereinafter referred to as the following grounds for sentencing), i.e., the grounds for sentencing.