beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.07.21 2013가합20673

소유권이전등기

Text

1. The Defendants are identical to the Plaintiff’s each real estate indicated in the “real estate” column of the Defendant’s share calculation sheet.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is the owner of each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”), and the individual real estate is the owner of each of the instant real estate in the same manner as “the instant first real estate” according to the sequence.

B. As to the Plaintiff’s instant real estate Nos. 1 and 2, the Plaintiff holds a title trust (hereinafter “instant title trust agreement”) with each of the Plaintiff’s 1/6 shares in BD, BE, BF, BG, BH, BH, BK, BL, and BM with respect to each of the instant real estate Nos. 3, and one-six shares in each of BD, BJ, BH, BH, BK, BL, and BM with respect to each of the instant real estate (the first registration was completed with respect to each of the instant real estate) (hereinafter “instant title trust agreement”), and the trustee completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to each of the instant 1/6 shares out of each of the instant real estate.

C. After that, all of the trustees died, and the Defendants finally succeeded to each of the shares indicated in the “Share of inheritance” column of the Defendant’s share calculation table among each of the instant real estate.

【Defendant 2-13, 15 through 52: Each entry in the written evidence of confession (Article 150 of the Civil Procedure Act), written evidence of confession (Article 150 of the Civil Procedure Act), written evidence of confessions (Article 150 of the Civil Procedure Act), the facts that there is no dispute, Gap evidence of subparagraphs 1 through 7, 8-1, 2, 14 through 18, 19-1, 2, 20, 21-1 through 12, 22, and 23; the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. The Plaintiff asserts that the Plaintiff was entrusted to the trustee, but the title trust contract of this case was terminated by the delivery of the complaint. Thus, the Defendants asserted that the Plaintiff is liable to implement each procedure for the registration of ownership transfer with respect to each share stated in the separate sheet for the Defendant’s calculation of shares among each of the instant real estate. The Defendants are deemed to have led to confession pursuant to Article 150 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Therefore, the above defendants are identical to the plaintiff's real estate in the "real estate" column of the attached defendant's share calculation table.