2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

However, on the other hand, the two pages 17 to 18 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be used as “within June 2014,” and the judgment on the allegations made by the plaintiff and the defendant in this court shall be added as follows.

2. Additional determination

A. At the time of entering into the instant insurance contract, no provision exists to require an insurance company to specify "matters relating to early withdrawal" or "standards for determining excessive withdrawal" in an insurance prospectus or to explain to policyholders at the time of entering into the instant insurance contract. Since 2004, the Financial Supervisory Service did not state "standards for determining excessive withdrawal" in the product summary and other guide materials until the date of entering into the instant insurance contract. It is difficult to see that the explanation of matters relating to early withdrawal was affected the conclusion of the Plaintiff’s insurance contract in light of the developments leading up to the conclusion of the instant insurance contract, and it is reasonable to view that "standards for determining excessive withdrawal" is an important matter of the instant insurance contract, which is subject to the duty to explain in light of the evidence and the purport of entry and the purport of the instant insurance contract, and the following factors can be seen as being the subject of the duty to explain in light of the aforementioned circumstances.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion cannot be accepted.

(1) Insurance companies and insurance solicitors' obligations under related Acts and subordinate statutes, such as the Insurance Business Act.