However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Around 09:20 on May 9, 2015, the Defendant expressed the victim’s desire to “E” at a large bit of “E, E, E, E, E, E, E, E, E, E, E, E, E, E, E, E, E, E, E, and E, E, E, E, A, E, E, and E, E, E, E, E, E,” in front of the house, and expressed the victim’s desire to listen to, and hear, the victim from the house, and assault the victim’s bridge by taking the victim’s head debt with both hands.

At around 12:35 on June 4, 2015, the Defendant insultd the victim publicly on the ground that the victim F (V, 54 years of age) did not conduct an examination against the Defendant’s will, on the ground that the victim F (V, 54 years of age) did not go against the Defendant’s will, the Defendant read the victim as “Iri-rith, Irith, Irith, I willrith, Irith, Irith, Irith, Irith, Irith, Irith, Irith, Irith, Irith, Irith, Irith, Irith, Irith, Irith, Irith, Irith, Irith, Irith, Irith, Irith, Irith, Irith,

Summary of Evidence

"2015 Highest 1364"

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement by the police about D (including G statements);

1. Symmetrics, photo of the scene of the incident, and photo of CCTV image data, "2015 Highest 1399";

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Articles 260(1) and 260(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (see the following reasons for sentencing)

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Probation Criminal Act was that the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year and six months on October 24, 2013 to a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a group, deadly weapons, etc.) and again committed the crime in this case during the suspended sentence of two years, and there is a need for any corresponding strict punishment.

However, the fact that the defendant is divided into his mistake, and after the divorce, suffers from depression and stimulative disorder.