사기
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
On January 2, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim C’s operation D in Songpa-dong 600, Songpa-gu, Songpa-gu, Seoul, that “The father is the E market, and will create food materials marina and logistics center on the site of the city. It would be possible to supply food materials or purchase marina. To this end, the Defendant made a false statement to the public official in charge of the Gu Council-si to grant alcohol and boomed rice, which would cause the cost to be subsidized.”
However, although the defendant's small father is the E market, there was no fixed plan to establish food materials marina and logistics center, and there was no intention or ability to allow the defendant to supply food materials to the E market even if he receives the money from the victim as personal living expenses, so there was no intention or ability to allow the defendant to supply food materials to the E market even if he receives money from the victim.
As such, the Defendant, as well as the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received two million won from the victim, around January 4, 2012, from the victim, and was given KRW 17 million in total over ten times from that time to March 10, 2012, as indicated in the separate crime list.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Partial statement of the suspect interrogation protocol of the accused by the prosecution;
1. Statement by the prosecution against C;
1. Statement to C by the police;
1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to computerized data, receipts and specifications of savings deposit transactions;
1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 347 of the Election of Imprisonment;
1. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the ground that Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., repayment to the victim of KRW 10 million and agreement is made with the victim, there is no same criminal record with the defendant, there is no record of being sentenced to suspension of qualifications or more severe punishment, and there is no record of being sentenced to a violation of his