When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. Around June 1, 2020, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Assault, etc. against a driver) on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (hereinafter “Aggravated Punishment, etc.”) was on board the victim B (the 58-year-old) driving on the C taxi steering line, and was driving on a road near the Nam-gu, Ulsan-gu, where the said taxi was under the influence of alcohol, the remainder of the misunderstanding that the victim would return to the road, but the victim was able to take twice the head of the fluent cell, ske the fluence, and opened the fluence of the said taxi under the influence of alcohol.

Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted the driver of a vehicle in operation.

2. The Defendant damaged property, at the same time, at the same place as the foregoing paragraph 1, and at the same time and place, as the foregoing paragraph 1, caused an accident of collision between the taxi head even and the parked vehicle due to the act such as the foregoing paragraph 1, which led to a collision between the taxi head even and the parked vehicle. As the police officers dispatched from the taxi after getting out of the taxi, the Defendant saw the taxi, and thereby, saw the Defendant’s cell phone at the front of the passenger car owned by the victim E, and damaged the front of the said car to take advantage of the Defendant’s cell phone in favor of the passenger car.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement of B and E;

1. Written estimate for vehicle repair, and application of related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 5-10 (1) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (the point of assault by drivers), Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and selection of fines, respectively, concerning the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract the workhouses are the Defendant’s confessions of the instant crime, the entire agreement was reached with the victims, and there is no record of punishment so far, and the Defendant’s age, environment, motive for the commission of the crime, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the commission of the crime shall be determined as indicated in the Disposition.