When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On August 28, 2016, at around 01:20, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the Defendant’s male-friendly distribution C 102-dong management office side by cutting down the fat, and was faced with the disturbance; (b) the circumstances leading up to the police box of the original police station called the Defendant upon receiving a report from 112; (c) the police officer affiliated with the same police officer called the Defendant; and (d) the Defendant check up the Defendant; and (d) the Defendant’s chest of the above E, “Gubbbbbbbbbbbs, which is a man,” was called the “Gub, which is a man,” and called the Defendant’s chest of the above E, and walked the fbbbbbbbbbbs, which was taken twice by a horse; and (d) the F f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f s.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the maintenance of public order of police officers and the handling of 112 Reporting Cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of E and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report the occurrence of cases;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 of the same Act concerning the applicable criminal facts and the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;