beta
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.10.24 2019나2002535

제적처분무효확인청구

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except that it is used after being revised as follows. Thus, it is cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(1) In light of the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court of first instance, the fact-finding and determination in the first instance are legitimate even if the evidence evidence No. 11 through 32, which was duly adopted and investigated by the court of first instance, is based on the following circumstances: (i) the principle of proportionality should be maintained in exercising the right to discipline against students; and (ii) the educational consideration should be considered as a core requirement or element in a similar case; and (iii) the part of the crime committed on February 2, 199, which was used by the court of first instance, is a relationship between the victim D (as, 19 years of age) and the university’s line; and (iv)

The plaintiff, after he headed with E, listened to the white white background that "a person has a sexual intercourse with E" from the victim, and tried to find E by breaking it, and the plaintiff did not see it differently from the victim, and found E at the home of the victim together with E.

1. From around 5:00 on October 28, 2016 to 7:00 on the same day, the Plaintiff suffered injury from the victim’s house located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and from the victim’s back to the victim’s house, the victim’s face and head, etc. were damaged to the victim’s face, face, and head, etc. requiring two weeks of treatment, on the ground that the victim’s sexual intercourses between the victim’s former male-child E and the Plaintiff’s sexual intercourses with the Plaintiff’s sexual intercourses.

2. The Plaintiff forced the victim to do violence, such as the time, time, place, feling of the victim’s head, feling of the victim’s head, etc., and let the fele kneel kneelel kele and knee knee with the victim, and forced the victim to do so with E who kne knee with the victim, knee knee with the victim.

Accordingly, the plaintiff is not obligated to do so.