2. The judgment of the court below is that the defendant made confession of all of the crimes of this case and reflects the depth of the crime of this case, that the crime of this case is committed on the one-time medication of phiphones, that the defendant is currently old, that he does not intend to administer narcotics any absolutely in the future, and that his family members want to break down the defendant's preference, etc., are favorable to the defendant, but there is a history favorable to the defendant, that the defendant has been punished nine times of punishment for the same kind of crime, that five times of punishment was committed without being aware of the fact that he was punished as a sentence, and that the court below committed the crime of this case in light of the sentencing of the same similar case, it seems that the court below determined the punishment considering the motive and circumstance of the crime of this case, the circumstances after the crime of this case, the age and character of the defendant, the character and conduct of the defendant, and the circumstances that are favorable to the defendant in the records and arguments of this case.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.