However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant, together with C, was trying to operate the said gas station in the form of sub-lease C and sub-lease, while he was trying to operate the gas station in the name of the above C, which was in the name of the above C. In December, 2012, the defendant's financial situation was not good.

In the process of receiving a loan from a financial institution, the Defendant used a lease contract in the name of C, which is necessary to provide a security deposit for the lease of the said gas station.

1. On January 2013, the Defendant forged private document: (a) without authority, for the purpose of uttering at the above E-owned office, entered a white paper in the lessee column of E-owned station lease contract under the name of the lessor and one other; (b) entered the Defendant’s name and resident registration number, etc. in a white paper in the lessee column of E-owned station lease contract under the name of the lessee; and (c) copied the above lease contract; and (d) forged one real estate lease contract under the name of the above F-party and one other C, a private document on rights and obligations.

2. On April 24, 2013, the Defendant: (a) during the process of immediately concluding a payment service loan agreement with G, a consumer financial loan employee, within the foregoing EY office; (b) around April 24, 2013, the Defendant issued the forged real estate lease agreement to the said G as if the said agreement was duly formed.

3. The Defendant, at the time, at the time and place specified in Paragraph 2, induces the victim by providing the lending contract under the name of the Defendant, forged as described in Paragraph 1 and Paragraph 2, with an immediate settlement service agreement (excluding the credit card payment amount from a financial company in advance to a chain store excluding the payment commission from a financial company following the following day, and a financial company receives money from a credit card company on the date of settlement), and deceiving the victim, and that is up to KRW 80,000,000.