폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
2. The judgment of the court below is advantageous to the fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case, but the crime of this case was committed with a deadly weapon and causing injury to the victim, and the nature of the crime is not very good. The victim appears to have suffered serious psychological legacy in this case, the victim did not agree with the victim, there is no special circumstance or circumstance that may be newly considered in sentencing after the decision of the court below, and there is no other change in the circumstances or circumstances that are newly considered in sentencing, and the motive, means, and result of the crime of this case and all other circumstances that are conditions of sentencing as shown in the arguments of this case and the records, such as the circumstances after the crime, are adequate.
Therefore, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.