A. The facts of recognition (1) around 21:05 on April 14, 2010, the Defendants: (a) went against the Plaintiff and the Defendant C’s shoulder that did not have a good reputation on the ground that the shoulder of the Plaintiff and the Defendant C was faced with the Defendant’s shoulder while driving the D apartment 808 Dong-gu D apartment 808 and the first floor; (b) Defendant B, by hand, was faced with the Plaintiff’s timber and arms; and (c) Defendant C was faced with the wall by being pushed off several times; and (d) Defendant C was at the victim’s face, thereby causing injury to the Plaintiff, such as dye, bones, which requires treatment for about three weeks.

(2) Defendant C, who was not under investigation by an investigative agency while the residents E, etc. of apartment at the above time and at the above time, lives immediately with the Plaintiff, who is not under investigation by the investigative agency.

The same openings

h. The current prosecution or police officers having five cases or more of crimes;

A. The Plaintiff’s honor was damaged by pointing out false facts by putting the noise “weeted” on the apartment in a low-year.

(3) On August 6, 2010, the Defendants received a summary order of KRW 500,000 from the Cheongju District Court on the grounds of criminal facts of the Defendants’ above bodily injury and defamation (hereinafter “instant accident”).

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, 2

B. According to the above facts, the Plaintiff suffered injury and defamation due to the Defendants’ harmful act, and the Defendants are liable to compensate the Plaintiff for the damages incurred therefrom.

2. Scope of liability for damages

A. The Plaintiff spent KRW 3,955,400 for medical expenses when hospitalized in the Furia Youth Hospital and received outpatient treatment due to the instant accident.

B. Although the Plaintiff sought lost income on the ground that the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the above hospital, there is no evidence to prove that the Plaintiff was engaged in labor before and after the hospitalization, and there was no import as a family principal agent.

It should not be accepted.