2. The lower court: (a) took into account the favorable circumstances that the Defendant had a history of criminal punishment several times; (b) was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for the same kind of crime; and (c) again committed the instant crime even during the repeated period; and (d) took into account the favorable circumstances that the Defendant agreed with the victim; and (b) sentenced the said sentence within the scope of the recommended sentencing guidelines set by the Sentencing Committee, taking into account the sentencing

In light of the records, the sentence of the court below does not seem to be too heavy or unreasonable, and there is no special change in circumstances to change the sentencing of the court below from the court below to the court below.

The defendant and prosecutor's assertion of unreasonable sentencing are without merit.

3. If so, the appeal by the prosecutor and the defendant is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.