도로법위반
The accused shall disclose the summary of the judgment of innocence.
1. At around 07:28 on March 10, 1994, A, an employee of the Defendant, operated the Defendant’s vehicle in violation of the restriction on operation of excessive vehicles on the road located in front of the Dong-dong Highway in the Dong-dong Highway located in the Gangseo-gu, Gangwon-do.
2. Determination and conclusion, the effect of Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545, Mar. 10, 1993; Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995) which is the applicable provisions of the above facts charged was retroactively lost pursuant to the Constitutional Court Order 2012Hun-Ga18, Oct. 25, 2012 and the proviso of Article 47(2) of the Constitutional Court Act, which is the applicable provisions of the above facts charged. Accordingly, the above facts charged constitute a case not guilty under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the judgment is publicly announced under Article 440 of the Criminal Procedure Act.