1. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment on the grounds of Defendant A’s appeal in light of the relevant legal principles and the evidence duly admitted, the lower court’s finding Defendant A guilty of all the altered charges on the grounds indicated in its reasoning is justifiable.

In so doing, contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal principles on the relevance of duties to the crime of accepting bribe and the crime of demanding bribe,

In addition, the lower court erred in calculating the amount of additional collection as alleged in the grounds of appeal.

It does not seem that it does not appear.

In addition, in this case where the above defendant was sentenced to imprisonment of 2 years and 6 months and a fine of 20 million won, the argument that the amount of punishment by the court below is unfair cannot be a legitimate ground for appeal.

2. As to Defendant D’s final appeal, Defendant D did not submit a written reason for final appeal within the submission period of the written reason for final appeal, and Defendant D did not state the grounds for final appeal in the final appeal.

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.