2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

On February 1, 2017, the Plaintiff first entered the Republic of Korea as a short-term visit (C-3) sojourn status, and on April 25, 2017, the spouse (C-2-3) of the Plaintiff, who is staying in the Republic of Korea as a stay status of study-manship (D-2-3) on April 25, 2017, entered the first domicile status of study-manship (D-2-3), and the period of stay was extended in succession.

(F-3) An application for change of status of stay for reasons of the life with the end of September 30, 2018 was filed.

B. On June 5, 2017, the Defendant rendered the instant disposition to the Plaintiff, which rejected the alteration of the status of stay on the ground of the Plaintiff’s failure to meet the requirements for the alteration of status of stay (F-3).

Article 22(1) of the former Administrative Appeals Commission Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 2010, Jan. 26, 2018).

【Fact-finding without a dispute over the grounds for recognition, evidence of subparagraphs 1 through 4, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. If a foreigner staying in the Republic of Korea wishes to engage in activities that fall under the status of sojourn different from his/her status of sojourn, a permit to change his/her status of sojourn shall be obtained in advance (Article 24(1) of the Immigration Control Act); if a foreigner intends to continue his/her sojourn in excess of the period of sojourn, he/she shall obtain the permission to extend the period of sojourn before the period of sojourn expires (Article 25 of the Immigration Control Act); if such permission

(Article 33(1) of the Enforcement Decree of the Immigration Control Act provides that the status of stay accompanied (F-3) shall be granted to a person as listed below (Article 10 of the Immigration Control Act, and Article 10 of the same Act, or the scope of activities 28. Accompanying (F-3), culture and arts (D-1) through specific activities (E-7) shall be granted to a person who has no spouse as a minor and spouse.