If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

At around 03:00 on August 30, 2016, the Defendant: (a) considered that E, from the position of the Seoul Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Police Station D District, who was dispatched after receiving a report of 112 that he was dead, listened to the reporter’s report; and (b) without any justifiable reason, he expressed E as “the bit of bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bit,” and (c) took place on one occasion on the top

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties concerning the handling of 112 reported duties by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to E and F;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is deemed to obstruct the exercise of public authority by assaulting a police officer in the course of performing his duties. However, the nature of the crime of this case is not good. However, the defendant is found to have committed the crime of this case by drinking and contingently committing the crime of this case, the degree of damage by the police officer injured by this case seems to be relatively minor, the degree of damage by the crime of this case is relatively minor, and the fact that there is no record of punishment or punishment exceeding the fine in the past, etc. shall be considered as favorable circumstances for the defendant. In addition, the defendant's age, character, character, environment, occupation, health conditions, relationship with the victim, motive, means and consequence of the crime of this case, and other various conditions of sentencing as shown in the records and arguments,