beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.01.19 2016고정1520

상해

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 400,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 6, 2015, the Defendant, at around 11:10 on the 2nd floor of the Gyeonggi-gun C Building, Gyeonggi-do, and around 11:10 on December 6, 2015, changed the design drawings to the victim D (37 tax) before the second floor of the building, but did not show the design drawings, and the Defendant, at his hand, inflicted an injury upon the victim’s face, and subsequently corrected part of the charges according to evidence, such as the statement of the victim, to the extent that it does not interfere with the Defendant’s exercise of his/her right to defense.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. A medical certificate;

1. As a result of inquiry into the facts of E dental services, the defendant and his defense counsel asserted that although the defendant had the victim's chest with the left hand at the time of the instant case, he did not have the face at the time, and therefore, the defendant's assault did not cause injury to the victim.

However, the following circumstances are acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court, i.e., the victim’s face from the Defendant.

The fact-finding with regard to the medical certificate and E dental services submitted by the victim consistently stated, ② The victim stated that “the victim was assaulted on December 6, 2015 and was salving many as soon as possible.” At the time of the victim’s entrance, Ma35 Professor37 Dao (2 Daegu on the left-hand side) through Ma37 Doo (2 Daegu on the left-hand side) and there were many parts of the victim’s entrance, ③ the father and the victim in the medical certificate that the victim suffered the injury are consistent, ④ The victim was in a bad condition, such as having a serious flassium before the assault, but the victim was flaged with the previous ging, and the number of opens became more frequent than the number of times of the assault, etc., the facts charged in this case are sufficiently recognized.

Therefore, the defendant and his defense counsel are not accepted.

. 【.】