However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 04:30 on September 26, 2015, the Defendant, at the entrance of the Gwangju Northern Police Station D District, located in Gwangju Northernbuk-gu, used the taxi fee settlement issue with E and Si expenses, and used the francing of E by hand, which was controlled from the border F of the D District, where he was working in the 112 patrol, and used the francing of F, “the francing of a few ages, the france, and the france.”

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted police officers who perform their duties on the prevention of crime and control of control.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of suspect of the police accused;

1. Statement of the police officer F;

1. E statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of a work log in the D Zone, police officers' photographs, CCTV images CDs, and written agreements;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] where the degree of violence, intimidation, and deceptive scheme is insignificant in the area of mitigation (one month to eight months), the area of mitigation (special mitigation) (one month to one month), [decision of sentence] of the suspended sentence (decision of sentence] of the Criminal Act on the grounds that the defendant recognized the crime of this case, and is in depth divided.

The defendant agreed with the taxi engineer who was the first time of the pet, and the considerable amount of money was deposited for the police officer.

In addition to the fine of 2001, the accused has no previous convictions.

In addition, it shall be decided as per Disposition by comprehensively taking into account the circumstances leading to the instant case, the age of the defendant, circumstances after the crime, etc.