2. It is recognized that the Defendant had no record of punishment for the same kind of crime.

However, the crime of this case is committed in the Olympic 5-lane, which is a motorway with a large number of vehicles driving in high speed, without turning on the direction direction from the section of about 1.4 km with a complaint to the victim's vehicle, and continues to run a motor vehicle in the direction in the direction of the victim's future, as the defendant changed in the direction in the section of about 1.4 km, the crime of this case is not easy, in light of the place of driving, driving distance, driving behavior, etc., and the responsibility for the crime is not easy, and the traffic risks caused by the crime seems to have not been reached up to the trial, and the defendant did not receive a letter from the victim, and the defendant's age, character, character, environment, family relationship, motive and consequence of the crime, and all the sentencing factors indicated in the arguments and the record of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, etc., it does not seem to have exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion, because the sentence imposed by the court below is too excessive.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.