If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On November 29, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of fraud at the Sungwon District Court's Sungnam branch, and the judgment became final and conclusive on March 6, 2013, following an appellate trial.

"2013 High 791" Defendant: (a) from around 01:00 on September 2, 2012 to around 03:20 on the same day, the victim D (the 31 year old and South) who is the head of the Dong-gu Seoul Metropolitan City business without any intention or ability to pay the price in the C entertainment drinking house located in B located in Gangdong-gu, Seoul; (b) received food equivalent to KRW 335,00,000, such as Tju and Japan, from the payment of the price, and obtained economic benefits by avoiding the payment of the price.

At around September 23, 2012, the Defendant ordered the victim's alcohol to pay the alcohol value in G managed by the victim F in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seoul, on September 23, 2012.

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the drinking value.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, was provided by the victim with alcohol equivalent to 170,000 won in the market value of 12 years and 12 years and 12 years and 400,000 won in total at the market value.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D or F;

1. Records before and after judgments: Criminal records, etc., inquiry reports, previous records of dispositions, results of confirmation, and application of statutes of the judgment;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.