When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person engaged in fishery as a captain of a fishing vessel B (4.86 tons) of a coastal complex and a new fishing vessel permitted to fish for a fluence.

Any person who intends to run a fishery business falling under the coastal fishery business including inshore fishery, which uses a non-powered fishing vessel or a powered fishing vessel with a gross tonnage of less than 10 tons, shall obtain permission for each fishing vessel or fishing gear from the Mayor/Do Governor.

Since the above fishing vessel has obtained a permit for coastal fisheries limited to the fishing zone from the Gyeong-do Gyeong-do Gyeong-do Gyeong-do Gyeong-do Gyeong-do Do, there is no permit for coastal fisheries that can be operated on the sea in Busan-do Do Do.

Nevertheless, at around 16:00 on September 3, 2018, the Defendant departed from the port of Young-gu, Busan Metropolitan City, with two seafarers and long-sea fishing cars, and around 17:00 on the same day, at around 17:0, the 4.4 nautical miles of the Do, Busan Metropolitan City, the sea of the Busan Metropolitan City, the Do, the Busan Metropolitan City, the Do, and operated unauthorized fishing operations at the sea of the Busan Metropolitan City without permission for coastal complex fishery in Busan Metropolitan City without permission.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Arrest report and investigation report of a person who commits an offense in violation of the Fisheries Act (the coastwise south-do, the coastwise boundary of Busan Metropolitan City, and the coastwise point);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to B documentary evidence, BV-Pas’s port registration map, certificate of shipment (B), and photographic statement of fishery permission (B);

1. Relevant provisions of the Fisheries Act and Articles 97 (1) 2 and 41 (2) of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Consideration, such as the fact that the defendant's reason for sentencing under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is against the defendant, that the maritime boundary of the Gyeongnam-do and Busan Metropolitan City is unclear, and that the defendant has a same criminal record.