except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 14, 2016, at around 18:40, the Defendant: (a) reported 112 in front of Gwangju City, that “A man who frights to sit, sound, and fright to fright,” and received a recommendation for returning home from a slope C belonging to the Gyeonggi Mine Police Station, a police officer, and a police officer, who was called to “A fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers in relation to 112 reported handling duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement related to C and D;

1. E statements;

1. Application of the video CD-related statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 of the same Act concerning the applicable criminal facts;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended sentence [Scope of the sentencing guidelines] - Basic area of obstruction of performance of official duties (decision of sentence in June to January] (decision of suspension of performance of official duties) - The execution of sentence shall be suspended in consideration of the fact that the defendant recognizes a crime and reflects the fact that the defendant commits a crime, and that the defendant commits a crime by contingency under the influence of alcohol, etc.