상해
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. On October 18, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 22:40 on October 18, 2013, on the E toilet located in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and (b) on the part of the victim F (the victim F) subtracting her her her m, the Defendant was only the Defendant, on the ground that the part of the victim’s her her tm was her her m, “demb,” and caused the injury of the victim’s her knife and her mar in need of two weeks of treatment.
2. The Defendant asserts to the effect that there was no injury to the victim by consistently doing so from the police to this court, and denies the above facts charged.
Therefore, in light of the following circumstances, the victim made a statement to the effect that he was injured by the victim, i.e., the victim was pushed the victim's breath, f, G's statutory statement, F's statement, and F's statement to the investigative agency and the statement to the effect that he was not injured by the victim, and that the victim made a statement to the effect that he was injured by the victim only after the victim was pushed the victim, i.e., the victim was satisfed or bated with bat at the investigative agency, and that there was no other damage (the 14th page of the investigation record), the process of issuing the written diagnosis of injury, and the fact that the victim was issued a written diagnosis of injury after the lapse of five days from the date of the occurrence of the instant case, and it appears that the hospital did not receive any specific treatment, and there is no evidence to conclude that the victim's injury caused by the assault by each evidence and the written diagnosis of injury alone was a crime of assault under Article 16 (1) of the Criminal Act.