beta
(영문) 광주지방법원해남지원 2017.09.19 2016가단2908

건물철거 및 분묘이굴 등

Text

1. The plaintiff

A. Defendant B shall deliver the land listed in [Attachment A] List 1 and 2, and the same list from August 26, 2016.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On July 30, 2002, Defendant B owned and occupied the land listed in paragraph (1) of the [Attachment List No. 1] on July 30, 2002 (hereinafter “instant land”) on the ground of “sale on July 19, 202” and “sale on March 18, 1999” on the land listed in Annex No. 2 of the [Attachment List No. 2] on March 25, 199, and on the land of this case No. 3 as of January 27, 1995, on the ground of “sale on April 9, 1981,” respectively, and Defendant C owned and occupied the ownership transfer registration on the land of this case on December 30, 193 on the ground of “sale on July 9, 1980.”

B. On August 25, 2016, the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the Plaintiff’s future on the grounds of “sale due to compulsory auction on August 23, 2016” with respect to each of the instant lands.

C. Attached drawing among the land No. 3 of this case

1. 표시 ㉠, ㉡, ㉢, ㉣, ㉤, ㉥, ㉦ 부분에는 피고 B 소유의 이 사건 각 건물이 있고, 이 사건 제4토지 중 별지 도면

2. On the part of the display (A), one grave set up by Defendant C (hereinafter referred to as “instant grave”).

The appropriate amount of rent for the period from August 26, 2016 to August 25, 2017 of each of the instant lands is as listed in the following table:

Land No. 1 99,4502 of this case No. 2, 41,3103 of this case No. 3 land No. 38,3103 4 of this case / [Grounds for Recognition] 190,895 of this case / [Judgment No. 1, 2, 4, Eul evidence No. 2 and 3 (including each number), Gap evidence No. 3, Eul evidence No. 4 (including each number), the result of the appraisal of rent for appraisal corporations of this country, the result of the appraisal of the court's appraisal of the land No. 2 of this case No. 31,3103 of this case by the court of this case, the result of the appraisal of rent No. 1, 2, 4, Eul evidence No. 2 and 3 (including each number), the purport

2. According to the above facts of recognition as to the claim for the land Nos. 1 and 2 of this case, the defendant B occupied the land Nos. 1 and 2 of this case, but owned by the plaintiff.