A. The Plaintiff and the Defendant engaged in the business of processing salt farms from September 1999, and the Defendant independently operated the above business on April 20, 200. However, on May 200, June, and August, 200, the Plaintiff and the Defendant paid KRW 30 million to the Plaintiff each in KRW 10 million, but the Defendant did not comply with the above agreement.

B. Accordingly, at the time, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Defendant for loans 2005 Ghana2811, and received a final and conclusive judgment, such as the purport of the claim.

C. After that, the defendant did not pay the money in accordance with the above judgment and extended the period of extinctive prescription because the claim under the above judgment is in a situation where the claim can be put on the extinctive prescription.

2. Article 208 (3) 1 of the Civil Procedure Act of the applicable provisions of Acts (Judgment without holding any pleadings due to the submission of a written reply);

3. Some damages for delay shall be partially dismissed in accordance with the main sentence of Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning Expedition, etc. of Legal Proceedings, which was amended on September 25, 2015 and enforced from October 1, 2015.