A Imprisonment for six months, Defendant B and C shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Defendants A and B are those engaged in the automobile trade business.

The Defendants, while showing the false and high-priced advertisements in which the market price is indicated, had the customers prepare the contract as if they were sold at a low price as shown in the advertisement, and let the customers deposit the vehicle price as shown in the advertisement. After notifying the fact that there was an installment that was not mentioned at the time of the contract, the Defendants solicited the customers to purchase other vehicles designated by the Defendants at a low-priced price by threatening them to purchase a large amount of penalty in order to cancel the contract.

On September 30, 2016, the Defendants reported the Internet advertisement to 7,470,000 won of the Grand Market in the subway station near the light name KTX Station, and found the victims D (W, 54,000 won) to sell the passenger car of the Grand Market to the victim for KRW 7,50,000,000,000, which is similar to the advertising in Suwon-si, and after preparing a sales contract with the victim to deposit KRW 7,50,000 as the price for the vehicle with the designated account by the Defendants.

Then, the Defendants should pay the victim a sum of KRW 1,764,00,00 in addition to the above payment.

In order to cancel a contract without paying an installment, the penalty of five million won shall be paid.

If a person does not want to do so, he/she would purchase another vehicle by no later than 9:00,000 won. The victim would like to impose a penalty in the amount of KRW 500,000 if he/she did not purchase a vehicle by no later than 9:00,000 on his/her own request and if he/she did not purchase a vehicle by no later than 9:0,000,000 won on the day.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly threaten the victim.