건물명도
1. The defendants' appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
1. The reasons why the member of the party who cited the judgment of the court of first instance states on this case are as follows: (a) the amended provisions of Article 10-4 of the Addenda to the Commercial Building Lease Protection Act (Article 3 of the Addenda to the Commercial Building Lease Protection Act) shall apply to the lease in existence at the time of enforcement of this Act (Article 10-4, May 13, 2015) at the end of the fourth decision of the court of first instance (Article 10 of the Addenda to the Commercial Building Lease Protection Act). However, since the contract of this case has expired on March 31, 2012, the contract of this case is terminated at the expiration of the period, the defendants shall not be entitled to the protection of opportunity to recover the premium, etc. under the Commercial Building Lease Protection Act), other than the addition,
2. In conclusion, the plaintiffs' claims are justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendants' appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.