However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On November 1, 2019, at around 00:50, the Defendant: (a) received a report from 112 on the street in front of the D main point located in Busan Jung-gu, Busan, and sent a 112 report that E was an assault; (b) the Defendant expressed that E was aboard the front seat of the F District of the Busan Jung-gu Police Station F District, Busan, and the security guards, in order to verify the damage caused by the damage, and that the said police officer took a bath to the said police officer; (c) “YY Y YE, dead, and fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor flu

As a result, the Defendant interfered with police officers' legitimate performance of duties concerning 112 reporting processing affairs.

2. At around 00:50 on November 1, 2019, Defendant B: (a) 1, at the above location, Defendant B: (b) saw E with the seat of the sprink G and G with the seat aboard the sprink; (c) continued to wear a photograph of the above police officers at the Busan mid-gu Busan Central Police Station F District in Busan, Jung-gu, Busan, around 01:50 on the same day; and (d) the police officers tried to break the entrance with the stone with a string of the sprink, which was located on the street near the sprink.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties related to 112 reporting processing affairs.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each statement made to G and H;

1. E statements;

1. Other closure photographs of police officers, such as damaged parts, photographs, etc., photographs, etc.;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes in written opinions;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of each community service order;

1. Scope of applicable sentences under law: One to five years of imprisonment for each month;

2. The scope of recommendations according to the sentencing guidelines (determination of type) shall be the obstruction of performance of official duties.