except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 15, 2014, at the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Yang Jae-2, 217 (State) DoFS office, the Defendant purchased the car 911 car and entered into a contract for a car loan of 80 million won with the victim Non-MMbp Korea Co., Ltd., Ltd., which held that the Defendant set up a mortgage on the said car as the mortgagee as the collateral for the above loan.

Nevertheless, around February 2015, the Defendant borrowed KRW 21 million from a credit service provider in the mutual disapproval in Gangnam-gu Seoul, and transferred the automobile to the credit service provider for the collateral.

In this respect, the defendant concealed the above Mador car, which is the object of the victim's rights, and obstructed the victim's exercise of rights.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements and written complaints of D;

1. Application of receipts, motor vehicle registration certificates and statutes;

1. Relevant Article 323 of the Criminal Act and Article 323 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of imprisonment;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act ( normal consideration, such as the fact that the criminal defendant repents the crime, and the fact that the criminal defendant has agreed to return the instant secured vehicle to the victim and smoothly agreed to do so);