2. The above fine is imposed on the Defendants.

1. Defendant A, around 12:00 on March 23, 2017, waiting a shuttle bus before the D Hospital located in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, was waiting for the loan of this tobacco, and the victim B (the victim South and the 46-year old-old-old-age-old-type-old-type-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-based-

As a result, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim by “absia of 4 poppy,” which requires approximately four weeks of treatment.

2. Defendant B, at the time, at the time, at the place specified in the above paragraph (1) above, he saw the victim A ( South and 48 years of age) and sculbling for the foregoing reasons, carried the victim’s face with breath, and continued to breath the victim’s bomb on the wall of the building.

As a result, the Defendant laid down the victim's 4,5 double-water cells to the right side in need of approximately 6 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Protocols concerning the interrogation of suspects by the prosecution against the Defendants;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Investigation report (to attach photographs of the suspect A and B) and damaged photographs;

1. A investigation report (Submission of a suspect A diagnosis report) and a diagnosis report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Submission of suspect B diagnosis reports) and diagnosis reports;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense (or selection of an injury or a fine);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the attraction of a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the provisional payment order are that all the Defendants reflect the crime and do not want to be punished against the other party; although the degree of the injury in this case is heavy, it appears to be the cause of expansion of damage due to blood medication; the Defendants’ health condition and criminal records (in the case of Defendant B), and violence.