2. It is recognized that the circumstances, such as the fact that the Defendant recognized and reflected the instant crime, and the amount and degree of the damage of this case are relatively minor.

However, when the Defendant repeatedly commits the crime of in without prison labor, the nature of the crime is grave, such as interfering with some of the victims' duties, and the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for habitual fraud on or around June 2015 and completed the execution of the sentence on April 9, 2016, even though he/she was sentenced to the punishment on or around June 2016, he/she began to commit the crime of this case more than 6 days, the Defendant had the record of being punished more than 40 times for the same crime, the damage in this case has not been recovered, the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, etc., and other various sentencing conditions as shown in the records and changes theory, the sentence imposed by the lower court is not heavier.

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.