A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1.5 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1.00,000.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

1. On August 8, 2015, Defendant A’s property damage: (a) around 22:20 on August 8, 2015, at the front taxi stops in Jung-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the victim F (52 years of age) who operated the said taxi, attempted to open a door in order to get in the taxi; (b) on the ground that the victim F (52 years of age) who was operating the said taxi did not want to get out of tobacco, and (c) caused damage to Defendant A’s property by walking the front and rear door on the right side of the said taxi so that the repair cost of KRW 480,000 is exceeded

2. The Defendants’ co-injury in common, at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, shall damage the said victim’s taxi at the time and place, and the Defendant A, who wishes to receive a claim from the injured party, shall be a habitual offender who opens money to the victim’s “the victim’s fech fe, feas, feas, feas, and intentionally set up a taxi and intentionally set up the taxi.”

“Absing the victim as “,” and Defendant B considered the victim’s arms and body by carrying and pushing the victim’s arms and body, and considered the part of the ship as knife.

As a result, the Defendants jointly inflicted bodily injury on the victim, such as cryp dump dump dump, fump dump dump, and fump dump dump dump.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Recording of a witness F's statement in the third public trial records;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Medical certificates, prescriptions, and guidance on taking medicines;

1. Written estimate and receipt;

1. Each investigation report (Evidence No. 1, 9, and 14) 【The point of damage to property: The police officer confirmed the damaged part of the on-site dispatch, and the evidence No. 14 constituted the facts charged in light of the estimates, receipts, etc. submitted. The facts charged may be acknowledged in the light of the following: The victim’s statement may be trusted, and the facts charged may be established in light of the above evidence and the Defendants’ acts, etc. following the dispatch of the police.” The application of the statutes to the Act and subordinate statutes

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act (the point of destruction) and Article 366 of the former Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (amended by Act No. 13718, Jan. 6, 2016).