도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
[criminal history] On December 27, 2006, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 5 million to the same court on October 27, 2010 as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Seocheon Branch of the Daejeon District Court on December 27, 2006, a fine of KRW 1.5 million for the same crime at the same court on October 27, 2010, and a fine of KRW 5 million for the same crime at the same court on October 14, 2013, respectively, and violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act at least twice.
[Criminal facts] The Defendant is a person who drives a DDara 300C car.
On April 28, 2017, the Defendant driven the above vehicle while under the influence of alcohol of 0.297% from blood, around 05:05, the Defendant driven the above vehicle with a alcohol content of 0.297% from his blood, and driven the road of 93-20 Embri-ro ebri-ro ebri-ro 93-20, 305 ahead of the apartment complex with two lanes from the side of the main apartment.
At the same time, there are many parked vehicles on the road side, so there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving a driver on the front side and the left side and safely.
Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant, who was negligent in driving and was parked on the right side of the Defendant’s front side by negligence, took the back part of the back part of the Defendant’s vehicle from the front side of the Defendant’s Had-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wed
Ultimately, the Defendant, by the above occupational negligence, destroyed the 4,050,935 won of the repair cost by using the pentum exchange, etc. of the said NAS car, and destroyed the 660,955 won of the repair cost by using the back penter exchange, etc., but did not take necessary measures to remove the obstacles to road traffic, and escaped without leaving the Defendant’s vehicle located at the same time.
Summary of Evidence
1. The defendant's statement in court;