However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 31, 2012, the Defendant entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant at the “C” office located in the Busan High-gu Busan High-gu Office to the effect that the Defendant sold the said machinery at his own discretion and embezzled it on May 2013, 2013, at the Busan High-gu Busan High-ro, with the Defendant’s employees in default of the name of 133,600,000 won at the market price. < Amended by Act No. 13874, May 31, 2012; Act No. 13574, May 31, 2015; Act No. 11854, May 31, 2012; Act No. 11871, May 31, 2013>

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a complaint, a statement of witness D;

1. Article 355 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor concerning the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the same Act (Article 62 (1) of the same Act (Article 62 (1) of the same Act (Article 62 (1) of the same Act provides that although the details of criminal conduct are not provided for less than those of the accused, there is no history of punishment for the

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;