성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months;
2.Provided, That the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
[criminal records] On July 27, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for four months, and the judgment was finalized on August 4, 2017.
[2] The Defendant, in collusion with B and C, operated a commercial sex trafficking business establishment in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju Metropolitan City Dtel No. 314, 112, 1213, and 1516, and the Defendant was willing to arrange sexual traffic against customers who find the place by employing female employees of Thailand's nationality by serving as an instruction for the place of sexual traffic, receiving commercial sex trafficking payments, etc., and B and C, by serving as an office building rental, publicity, etc.
1. Violation of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts, Including the brokerage, etc. of sexual traffic (e.g., brokerage, etc. of sexual traffic) committed between October 2016 and March 23, 2017, the Defendant, in collusion with B and C, employed the F, etc. of the native nationality as an employee of sexual traffic in the said business establishment, as a female employee, and received delivery of KRW 10 to 200,000 in return for sexual intercourse from the said female employee to the said female employee.
Accordingly, the defendant conspireds with B and C to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.
2. No person who violates the Immigration Control Act shall employ any foreigner having no status of sojourn eligible for employment activities;
Nevertheless, the Defendant, on March 22, 2017, employed the F of Thailand’s nationality, who entered the Republic of Korea as a tourism visa rather than the status of sojourn that allows the Defendant to engage in job-seeking activities from around March 22, 2017 to March 23, 2017, to work as a female employee of sexual traffic at the said establishment.
Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with B and C, employed a foreigner who did not have the status of sojourn eligible for employment activities.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect with respect to F;
1. A report on internal investigation (Attachment to the current status of entry or departure), and a report on internal investigation (request for accusation against an immigration offender- Gwangju immigration management office);
1. Publicity photographs of the business place;