When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

The defendant is engaged in the duty of driving Category C rocketing taxi.

On September 30, 2016, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 1:30 on September 30, 2016, and led to a three-lane road in front of the Gwangju Seo-dong Office, Seo-gu, Gwangju, to the direction of the post office of Gwangju in the direction of the city of salt-based, and led to a flow to the salt-based sports center while driving in the speed of the city according to one-lane.

At the time, the injured vehicle is getting off, and the affected vehicle was bypassing according to the Gwangju post office, and the place is where the U-turn is prohibited because the center line of yellow-ray is installed, so in such a case, the driver of the vehicle is prohibited from making a U-turn, and there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving the front bank well and safely.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and caused the collision of the victim D, who was in the atmosphere of the signal by bypassing the center line as above due to the negligence of the Defendant’s failure, with the top-hand part of the vehicle driving ahead of the Defendant’s driving vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by negligence in the above occupational negligence, suffered from the salt salvine of the salvine requiring treatment for the above victim, but failed to immediately stop and take measures such as providing relief to the injured party.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or F;

1. A yellow dust survey report and CCTV images of a G cafeteria;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes, such as a medical certificate and reply (19 pages of investigation records);

1. Article 5-3 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and Article 5-3 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 268 of the Criminal Act and selection of fines concerning the crime;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act are as follows: (a) the circumstances indicated in the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, circumstances and results of the instant crime; and (b) the following circumstances.