For the reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court affirmed the first instance judgment that acquitted the Defendants on the charge of aiding and abetting the violation of the Door-to-Door Sales Act among the facts charged against the Defendants.

Examining the relevant legal principles and records, the lower court’s aforementioned determination is justifiable.

There is no error by misapprehending the legal principles on aiding and abetting crimes.

On the other hand, the prosecutor appealed the entire judgment of the court below, but the prosecutor did not state the legitimate grounds of appeal in the petition of appeal and did not state the grounds of appeal in the petition of appeal.

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.