손해배상(기)
1. The defendants' appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
1. The reasoning of the court of first instance’s explanation concerning the instant case is as follows, with the exception of adding the following “2. Additional Judgment” to the assertion that the Defendants are emphasized in the trial of the court of first instance, and thus, the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to that of the court of first instance. As such, this is cited by the main sentence of
(However, the part corresponding only to the co-Plaintiffs of the first instance court, which has been separately determined. ① “B, etc. has been used in the course of the FDS development work” is amended to “Defendant A’s employees stored the said card customer information on the computer for business purposes and shared the storage spora.”
② From February 2013 to February 2, 2013, it is possible to collect and use data from Defendant A’s employee C in relation to the development of FDS of the Defendant’s National Card.
It was known that it is possible to listen to the word to that effect and use the functions by linking the USB camera with the computer for business purposes.
B, on February 2013, when the Defendant’s national card was not notified of this fact, the Defendant’s national card was not installed in the opticalized copy of the Defendant’s card, and then the Defendant’s national card’s member’s customer information was arbitrarily stored in the above USB camera, and then the Defendant’s member’s customer information was stored in the Defendant’s national card member’s computer for business use.
"Modifications to the following parts":
"A" became aware that the files can be stored when connecting USB meta because security programs are not installed in the business computer that he uses while performing the FDS development work at the Madernbook Center.
B The defendant's national card opticalization center around February 2013.