Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

The Defendant, from April 4, 2017 to April 22:4, 2015, from around 22:4, 2017 to April 4, 2017, on the ground that the victim D, the owner of the place of business, was unable to find a job after leaving the Defendant at the general restaurant “C” general restaurant of Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, B, and where the victim D, the owner of the place of business, was unable to find a job after leaving the Defendant.

The victim interfered with the general restaurant business by force, such as bringing customers who have been frighten in a large sound, leading them to feel, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the police interrogation protocol to E or D;

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground of the Defendant’s disturbance for the sentencing of the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act appears to have caused substantial property damage, such as the deprivation of other customers who drink at the victim’s main point, and the victim’s mental suffering also seems not to have been written. The Defendant again repeated similar crimes despite the enemy who was punished due to business obstruction in 2014 and 2016.